Calories? Are they equal as to weight gain?

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
3,741
Tokens
On a 1500 calorie a day diet would it matter if 110 of those calories were from fat as to gaining/loosing weight-- Not exceeding 1500 TOTAL calories?

The can of tuna fish/chicken salad that I've been eating at lunch has this in it. It's not water based.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
585
Tokens
No it won't matter if those calories are from fat, it won't go on to you as fat especially when you're only consuming 1500 calories per day! besides, not all fats are created equal! most of the fats especially in tuna fish are actually good for you, it is the saturated fats that you want to keep an eye on at all times; it's never a good idea to have too manh saturated fats.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
585
Tokens
btw, tuna chunks in can are better than the sandwich tuna in can
chicken breast fillets best, avoid thigh and wings and take off skin
 

New member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
585
Tokens
pleasure to share, glad its well received.
gl on that diet, although a tad too low on cals for my likings :)
keep us updated!
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
3,741
Tokens
The only thing that seems goofy to me about product labeling is why do they say Calories from fat 110. I mean what difference does it make if a calorie is a calorie?
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
I think it matters more when you're talking about junk like chips, where a high percentage over 50% are from fat...1500 calorie diet is extreme, unless you weigh 150lbs
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
3,741
Tokens
The whole "calorie" deal is confusing to me. You have the word FAT and the term SATURATED FAT next to it on some products. We've all been told by now that Saturated Fats are to be avoided. Difference in these?
I guess this calorie intake idea as it's connected with weight gain/loss is more ART than SCIENCE.
I don't think it's well explained for the average person. Just my opinion.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
585
Tokens
Whoson1st said:
The whole "calorie" deal is confusing to me. You have the word FAT and the term SATURATED FAT next to it on some products. We've all been told by now that Saturated Fats are to be avoided. Difference in these?
I guess this calorie intake idea as it's connected with weight gain/loss is more ART than SCIENCE.
I don't think it's well explained for the average person. Just my opinion.

I'll try explain it simply for you:

Calories is a method of measuing the energy content in food, the average male requires about 2500 calories in a day for his normal bodily functions, an athlete or resistance trainer will require more energy from his/her food. The reason why fatty foods have more calories is because they contain more fat, fat is more energy dense in terms of calories. Fat however isn't utilised as efficiently by the body to use as energy but is stored very easily as we all know.

Humans need fat from their diet for their body for things such as cell generation and some for energy amongst other things, there are different kinds of fats. Saturated fats are the ones you want to try minimise as it is the fat that clogs your arteries and contributes more to cardiovascular problems. People who get their 'calories' from junk food are called 'empty calories' because they provide very little nutritional value for you.

You need to get your energy from all the good foods, you need a full intake of all your vitamins and minerals in a good diet.

An example, a large big mac meal from mcdonalds will provide you with approximately 1075 calories of energy from that food, all in one meal! but hardly nutritious for your body is it? You're far better off having 3-5 meals throughout the day of good value to you and low in fat. Fat has about twice the calories per part than carbs and proteins. Adults should get 45 percent to 65 percent of their calories from carbohydrates, 20 percent to 35 percent from fat, and 10 to 35 percent from protein.

hope I've made it a little easier to understand, any more questions just ask.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
3,741
Tokens
gmanea said:
I'll try explain it simply for you:

Calories is a method of measuing the energy content in food, the average male requires about 2500 calories in a day for his normal bodily functions, an athlete or resistance trainer will require more energy from his/her food. The reason why fatty foods have more calories is because they contain more fat, fat is more energy dense in terms of calories. Fat however isn't utilised as efficiently by the body to use as energy but is stored very easily as we all know.

Humans need fat from their diet for their body for things such as cell generation and some for energy amongst other things, there are different kinds of fats. Saturated fats are the ones you want to try minimise as it is the fat that clogs your arteries and contributes more to cardiovascular problems. People who get their 'calories' from junk food are called 'empty calories' because they provide very little nutritional value for you.

You need to get your energy from all the good foods, you need a full intake of all your vitamins and minerals in a good diet.

An example, a large big mac meal from mcdonalds will provide you with approximately 1075 calories of energy from that food, all in one meal! but hardly nutritious for your body is it? You're far better off having 3-5 meals throughout the day of good value to you and low in fat. Fat has about twice the calories per part than carbs and proteins. Adults should get 45 percent to 65 percent of their calories from carbohydrates, 20 percent to 35 percent from fat, and 10 to 35 percent from protein.

hope I've made it a little easier to understand, any more questions just ask.

Well, You are extremely knowledgable on the subject. Thanks for the feedback. But I have found out one very important thing. The 1/2 cup of tuna that I 've been eating (with the calories from fat made by Bumble Bee; is totally different from the water based Starkissed brand which has 0 FAT. It doesn't taste good to me ,but I just had it for lunch, with the other things allowed. Was only supposed to be eating water based. But I figured with such a tiny can what could it possibly hurt--Wrong-I guess.)
I never knew till reading this diet that peanut butter was considered a meat. (Allowed 2 tablespoons as one of the choices in one of the meals). Learning to eat less, isn't as bad as I thought....but it should taste good. TUNA=Not so good.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
585
Tokens
I've got an interest in the field :) I study sports science as well as work as gym instructor. We are all always learning.

Not sure exactly why they would say peanut butter is considered a meat, it is probably due to the amino acids. Peanut butter is normally eaten with bread so therefore the essential amino acids combine from each food to make complete protein, in the same way a meat product gives you all the essential amino acids. Peanut butter is ok sometimes but in moderation, usually too many added oils in making it although peanuts do have a lot of fat naturally.

Don't understand why you say tuna not good? Tuna is pretty good but there are some shitty cans being made out there, perhaps you should try get some fresh fish in your diet. The fats in fish is important, omega 3s. Good idea have a piece of blue grenadier for dinner one night a week, they are quite cheap and good for you as well as yummy!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,120,834
Messages
13,587,824
Members
101,016
Latest member
damangame81
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com